Why Injecting Anti-Matter Into Your Brain is the Hip New Thing With the Kids These Days

28 Feb

For those of you who don’t know, I’m a Master’s Student in Medical Physics. Let me beat you to the punch: Medical Physics is a wide discipline, but deals largely with two distinct fields. The first is Medical Imaging or diagnostics, which uses different techniques to image the body and diagnose pathology, namely cancer. The second is Medical Treatment, which I happen to be interested in and, therefore, what the subject of my thesis. About 90% of what we as MedPhysicists deal with is cancer, and my side of things deals almost exclusively with how to use radiation to treat cancers, or how to improve the quality of life for a patient.

When I was asked, or rather coerced, into posting something scientific, I thought about what someone with a modest scientific background would find interesting. I decided to eighty-six my research about treatment and go with the other side of the coin, the diagnostic imaging part . Although I am by no means an expert on this, (hell, there are kids in my program who know a lot more than I do about this) I figured it might be more interesting and take less scientific explanation to go this route. (If I was way off base, I apologize. Next time I can lecture about why not to stare at the sun) So here we go. Strap yourself in.

Diagnostic Imaging uses many different techniques to image the body. The one we’re probably most familiar with is the radiograph, or x-ray. Wilhelm Roentgen discovered these wonderful beams of death (just ask Marie and Pierre Curie) in 1895 and received the first Nobel Prize in physics in 1901. Things have been moving by leaps and bounds since then, but the really interesting stuff has happened in the last 30 or so years. The radiograph is about the same as it was back then; you accelerate electrons toward a source and just the bending of the electrons paths near a positively-charged nucleus (usually Molybdenum) causes an x-ray to shoot off. You can steer this ray through a patient and onto a fluoroscopic film on the other side. Do this a few million times, and the ones that hit air will go straight through, most of the ones that hit tissue will go through, and very few of the ones that hit bone will make it out on the other side. Hence the spooky skeleton business. What a radiograph measures, then is absorption. Dense stuff absorbs more, etc. This was all well and good, except radiographs kinda sucked, and guess what, they still do. But they’re cheap, and techs can’t screw them up as easily. So what came after Roentgen? Without going into all the advancements in medical imaging, let me hit some major steeping stones along the way.

In the 70’s some wacky dudes in the Midwest figured out that if you took little slices (~1 mm thick) from the front, back, sides and some angles in between you could use this new, kick-ass thing called a computer to assemble all the projections to give an image! Do this every millimeter down the length of the body and damned if you don’t get a 3-D image. This is a CT scan, or “cat” as you might hear it called. It stands for Computed Tomography, and although it gives you a seriously substantial dose of radiation, it is an excellent and widely-used imaging modality in modern times. Then you have ultrasound, which kinda blows but is cheap and doesn’t cook you, and MRI which still blows my mind but is way too complicated to get into here. So, if you’re still reading this, you’re probably asking when does the cool shit start? Right now, baby.

What do all of these things have in common? They image anatomy, but not physiology. They tell you what’s in there but not what’s going on. This brings me to the PET scan (Positron Emission Tomography). If you’re science-savvy, or, rather if you haven’t been living under the proverbial rock for the last 60 years, you probably noticed the word ‘positron’. No, a positron isn’t something we come across day to day. In fact they were theorized by some wicked smart quantum physicists last century and took a hell of a long time to find physically. They are anti-matter. I could bore you with WHAT anti-matter is all day, but this is a long post anyhow. Lets just say that for every little bit of matter, there is an identical piece of anti-matter, and whenever anti-matter touches matter, a lot of energy comes out (how much, we’ll see later). So a positron is the anti-particle of our electron, and only comes out through nuclear decays, the occasional cosmic ray, and hardcore experiments like the Fermilab or CERN in Switzerland

So what the hell does anti-matter have to do with medical imaging? Some seriously brilliant minds figured out that when certain radionuclides decayed, they gave off positrons, but that wasn’t too interesting because they wouldn’t travel any appreciable distance before they hit some matter and annihilated. But they figured out this might be of interest, because, after all, the annihilation produces our old friend Mr. x-ray (I’m kinda lying here, if actually produces gammy rays, but they’re very similar). So, first, a little graphical help: this is what happens when a positron hits an electron. See Figure 1 figure 1.JPG  So here we are. Notice that the two photons (x-rays) are moving in completely opposite directions and have the same energy. This arises from the laws of conservation of energy and momentum, which I refuse to explain (pick up a high-school textbook, you lazy bum). But why 511 keV you might ask? 1) What the hell is a keV and 2) why such an arbitrary number? First, a keV is a unit of evergy, called a kilo-electron-volt. No matter what the hell it really means, but lets say it’s VERY small. Next question. A little more schooling in physics (trust me on this) shows that Einstein was actually right, the crazy bastard, and energy and mass ARE interchangeable. Which means you can express how massive something is in terms of energy and vice versa. So particle physicists often express masses, or weights of particles in units of energy (strange, I know, but useful mathematically). Long story short, the rest-mass (if it were moving it would be heavier, also something we can thank Albert for) of the electron is 1.022 MeV (Mega-electron volt….a WHOLE LOT of energy), and when it disappears in the annihilation, that much energy has to come out; since there are 2 of the same thing, they split the energy equally (Don’t worry, they don’t have mass). (Side-note…what I just told you explains fission, fusion, nuclear weapons and nuclear power…think about it…maybe the topic for the next lecture?) Anyhow, this means that wherever the radionuclide, 2 photons would shoot off in exactly opposite directions. If you could somehow detect these 2 photons, you could draw a line between them and know that the annihilation, and therefore the radionuclide existed on that line. That’s exactly what the scientific community did.  See figure 2.figure 2.JPG  The patient sits in a big gantry, surrounded by a ring of detectors, and when two photons are detected at the same time the computer software uses complex algorithms to figure out where it came from. So the last question is how does this really apply to cancer? Different chemicals in the body are used by different organs, cells and processes. Your brain uses a lot of sugar, for instance. It’s like the brain’s food. On the other hand, Iodine is sucked up by the Thyroid gland in the neck. Normally these chemicals are normal and come from food and the world around us, but when this whole PET thing came about, people started to figure out you can change a few atoms on these chemicals and all the sudden they’re radioactive. Now relax, they’re not THAT radioactive, but they still decay by emitting positrons, which we like. Something called FDG is a sugar used by the brain. It’s actually called fluorodeoxyglucose, but that’s the point. You see the word fluoro in there? That’s usually a normal Fluorine atom on that big chemical chain, but we can throw on F-18, which is a positron emitter. The brain doesn’t know the difference chemically, but as soon as it goes there, the decay starts and bam, a picture of the brain comes out. What’s more, is that if there happens to be a tumor there, its using a lot more food to grow and spread, so more FDG is sucked up, and therefore, more shows up on the scan. Similarly, we use a chemical called Technetium 99m because it gets sucked up by the bones, and shows bone tumors. This is the ONLY modality that shows the body’s function and anatomy. Although these aren’t as high quality as conventional radiographs, they give info the x-ray simply can’t.

So people willingly inject anti-matter into their bodies. It can save lives, and does every day. The same principles that allow nuclear power and the wonderful ability to destroy mankind also allows us to see the body and its processes in ways Wilhelm Roentgen could never have imagined. Please feel free to send questions my way regarding the content here, and there are many more resources online, but I must warn you, none of them are this in your face, hardcore, and downright sexy. Rock and roll, Don Herbert. Rock and roll.—  Matt Goss


7 Responses to “Why Injecting Anti-Matter Into Your Brain is the Hip New Thing With the Kids These Days”

  1. Phantom Stranger March 3, 2006 at 3:40 pm #

    So do they inject you with the F-18 and/or the Technetium 99m in order for the PET scan to work?

    And what dose of radiation does a CT scan give you? Is there an interval in which you shouldn’t recieve consecutive CTs (i.e. one CT scan every 12 hours)? Does it dissappate or does radiation accumulate?

  2. Matt Goss March 7, 2006 at 9:34 pm #

    I’ll address each questions separately:

    So do they inject you with the F-18 and/or the Technetium 99m in order for the PET scan to work?

    Yes. You need a positron emitter for the whole deal to work.

    And what dose of radiation does a CT scan give you?

    Each clice of a CT is relatively small, but each projection and slice adds up. It ends up giving you up to 5 mSv, which is a unit of Dose. Means nothing you say? A normal chest x-ray gives about 0.02 mSv. So one CT can deliver as much as 250 times the radiation as a normal AP radiograph. Also, for reference, an FDG PET scan can be as much as 15.3 mSv, but keep in mind this is done much less frequently than a CT.

    Is there an interval in which you shouldn’t recieve consecutive CTs (i.e. one CT scan every 12 hours)?

    As far as I know, no, but there is no reason to get more than one every few days, even for patient positioning on a treatment gantry.

    Does it dissappate or does radiation accumulate?

    Good and very complicated question. Short answer, once you get it, you always have it. Long answer says that the convention now is to accept a linear or linear quadratic dose-effect model, meaning that although there is no evidence for effects at very low levels of radiation, authorities and reports, such as the ICRP and ICRU adopt the stance that there is no threshold; any exposure can cause ill effects, which is obviously conservative. There is a HUGE industry and profession in the U.S. dealing only with radiation protection. In fact, thats one of the tracks in my program. Too bad its choc full of politics, bureaucracy , and protocols. Tunrs out I’ll most likely get wrangled into taking on the responsibilities of a radiation safety officer wherever I end up working. Yahoo.

    Thanks for the questions

  3. N S December 14, 2008 at 1:27 am #

    So what happens to the electron that collides with the positron and turns into energy?? Doesn’t that mess with the charge on the particles in your body?

  4. Amy March 15, 2009 at 12:35 am #

    I was searching for a test answer for my physics class and stumbled across this website. I have no questions for you but thought I would tell you (regardless of not finding my answer) that I enjoyed reading this, it was very interesting to me.

  5. Lokesh Pathak July 1, 2011 at 7:34 am #

    At the time of big-bang it is believed that equal no. of matter and antimatter emerged from nowhere (absolute vacuum) and within fraction of a second it recombined and annihilation occurred but the strangest thing happened – for every 1 billion matter and antimatter particles each, 1 matter particle remained and those remaining matter particles made up everything in the cosmos. Has any physicist has explained it why?.
    Does it indicate a hidden power (beyond our reasoning and imagination) which acted at that time so that I could communicate with you?

  6. The Crestroyer Theory September 4, 2012 at 1:08 pm #

    Interesting article. I would like to comment on my take on anti-matter. You seem like a guy who knows a lot about positrons and physics.

    My take is, tthat your consciousness and your mind is located in a complete separate universe from all others.

    When you experience out of body phenomena you are in a complete command of your own universe, and look at the physical universe entirely from your separate universe.

    My view on you and antimatter is, that antimatter is the mind and consciousness of all living entities.

    You are your own universe.

    Reality is where the minds (antimatter) meets the physical universe. You can create anything in your own universe.

    Interested? Then read my philosophical multiverse theory.

    Google crestroyer theory, and find it instantly.


  7. order goji Berry Burn August 9, 2014 at 5:01 pm #

    If you are going for best contents like myself, simply go
    to see this web site all the time because it gives feature contents, thanks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: